the WattHomeNewsEspañol
Análisis

Wood Mackenzie: Federal Permitting Review Stalls 92 GW of U.S. Clean Energy

32% of early-stage wind, solar, and battery projects face additional federal scrutiny, with $121 billion in investment exposed.

Por REDACCIÓN THE WATT · 01 jul 2026 · 2 MIN READ
Solar farm with rows of photovoltaic panels and transmission towers in an industrial desert landscape
Imagen generada con inteligencia artificial

As of June 29, 2026, consultancy Wood Mackenzie published the report "Federal friction: permitting risk across the US utility-scale renewables pipeline," estimating that 92 gigawatts (GW) of early-stage clean energy projects in the United States, 32% of the total pipeline, are exposed to additional federal scrutiny putting $121 billion in investment at risk.

The trigger was a Department of the Interior (DOI) directive dated July 15, 2025, which centralized permitting reviews for wind and solar projects and required approval from Secretary Doug Burgum's office at each stage. Since then, 7 GW on federal lands were cancelled or frozen, and another 80 GW on private land became trapped in bottlenecks through the "federal nexus" mechanism, primarily Army Corps of Engineers wetland permits and Pentagon airspace reviews. Wind is the hardest-hit sector (62% of its pipeline under scrutiny), followed by solar (30%) and battery storage (over 25%), according to Latitude Media.

For the broader region, the U.S. bottleneck is reshaping capital flows. The same institutional funds financing projects in ERCOT, PJM, or CAISO increasingly find Latin American markets, with more streamlined permitting processes, to be a viable deployment alternative. Costs already reflect the strain: solar power purchase agreement (PPA) prices rose 4.6% in Q1 2026 to $64.49/MWh, while wind PPAs climbed 8% to $79.40/MWh, according to LevelTen Energy. In April 2026, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction blocking new restrictions, but the ruling did not resolve existing bottlenecks. The SPEED Act (Simplifying Permitting and Ending Endless Delays Act), passed by the House of Representatives in December 2025, aims to shorten environmental review timelines, but it still awaits a Senate vote, as reported by pv magazine Latinoamérica.

While grid operators PJM and MISO work to avoid capacity shortfalls by 2030 (electricity demand is projected to grow 21% that decade), Mexico offers a sharp contrast. In December 2025, the Ministry of Energy (SENER) authorized 20 projects totaling 3,320 MW of renewable generation and 1,488 MW of battery storage under its binding planning framework, attracting $4.752 billion in private investment. For developers with exposure on both sides of the Gulf, Mexico's permitting window represents an alternative that simply does not exist north of the border.

This article was prepared with artificial intelligence assistance from verified sources and reviewed by a human editor before publication.

This article was drafted with AI assistance from verified sources and reviewed by a human editor before publication.

Frequently asked questions

¿Cuántos gigavatios de energía limpia están en riesgo por la revisión de permisos en Estados Unidos?
Según Wood Mackenzie, 92 GW de proyectos eólicos, solares y de baterías en etapa temprana están expuestos a escrutinio federal adicional, el 32% del pipeline total, con 121,000 millones de dólares en inversión en riesgo.
¿Qué provocó el bloqueo de permisos para proyectos de energía limpia en Estados Unidos?
Una directiva del Departamento del Interior del 15 de julio de 2025 centralizó la revisión de permisos y exigió la aprobación directa de la oficina del secretario Doug Burgum en cada etapa, lo que generó cuellos de botella por permisos de humedales y revisiones de espacio aéreo del Pentágono.
¿Qué es la Ley SPEED y cómo busca resolver los retrasos en permisos de energía en EE.UU.?
La Ley de Simplificación de Permisos y Fin de Retrasos Interminables (SPEED Act) fue aprobada por la Cámara de Representantes en diciembre de 2025. Busca acortar los plazos de revisión ambiental y eliminar duplicidades; aún espera votación en el Senado.
Share:✓
← All news