the WattHomeNewsEspañol
Política

Moody's Warns Energy, Autos, and Steel Complicate USMCA July Deadline

The ratings agency identifies Mexico's state-participation model in energy as the primary friction point with Washington's demands in the treaty review.

Por REDACCIÓN THE WATT · 17 jun 2026 · 2 MIN READ
Negotiating table with USMCA documents and Mexican and U.S. flags
Imagen generada con inteligencia artificial

Moody's warned on June 16, 2026 that the energy chapter is the most complex element in the review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA): the state participation model in the sector, the ratings agency noted, represents the primary friction point with Washington's demands for non-discriminatory market access.

The second round of bilateral Mexico-U.S. negotiations took place on June 16 and 17, with July 1 as the formal treaty review date. El Universal reported that Moody's expects the process to produce bilateral agreements between Mexico and Washington rather than preserving the original trilateral framework, given that Canada does not appear on the announced meeting schedule. For Mexico, the implications are immediate: approximately 90% of trilateral trade benefits from USMCA provisions, and qualifying products are exempt from several tariffs recently imposed by Washington. The agency flagged the risk that stricter conditions could delay agreements and erode Mexico's medium-term investment, trade, and growth outlook.

Moody's identified three sectors with the lowest probability of a deal in this renegotiation: energy, automobiles, and steel. For the automotive sector, the agency pointed to stricter rules of origin and global tariffs of 25% as the main risk factors. Mexican steel faces 50% tariffs under Section 232 of U.S. legislation. In energy, the central obstacle is the state participation structure, which Moody's identified as the primary conflict point with Washington's demands for market opening. Forbes México reported that the treaty review will be volatile in character, though the agency maintained as its baseline scenario that the agreement will not be abandoned entirely.

The week of July 20 is shaping up as the next inflection point in negotiations, according to the timeline reported by El Universal. Long-term contracts in the energy sector will remain in a state of regulatory uncertainty until the most sensitive chapters reach a formal close.

This article was produced with artificial intelligence assistance based on verified sources and reviewed by a human editor before publication.

This article was drafted with AI assistance from verified sources and reviewed by a human editor before publication.

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué dijo Moody's sobre el capítulo energético en la revisión del T-MEC?
Moody's identificó el capítulo energético como el de mayor complejidad en la revisión del T-MEC, señalando que el modelo de participación estatal de México no se alinea con las demandas de EE.UU. por acceso no discriminatorio al mercado, según análisis del 16 de junio de 2026.
¿Cuáles son las fechas clave de la renegociación del T-MEC en 2026?
La segunda ronda bilateral México-EE.UU. se celebró el 16-17 de junio de 2026, la revisión formal está fijada para el 1 de julio, y la semana del 20 de julio se perfila como el siguiente punto de inflexión en las negociaciones.
¿Por qué el acero y los autos también son capítulos difíciles del T-MEC según Moody's?
Moody's señaló que el sector automotriz enfrenta normas de origen más estrictas y aranceles del 25%, mientras que el acero mexicano está sujeto a aranceles del 50% bajo la Sección 232 de la legislación estadounidense.
Share:✓
← All news