the WattHomeNewsEspañol
Análisis

Two in Ten U.S. Storage Projects Are Weighing Operation Without the ITC

The premium on U.S.-manufactured batteries, at $160 to $180 per kWh, means the 30% tax credit does not always pencil out.

Por REDACCIÓN THE WATT · 29 ago 2026 · 2 MIN READ
Battery containers at a storage facility in the southwestern United States
Imagen generada con inteligencia artificial

A Latitude Media analysis published on August 28 documented that U.S. storage developers are reassessing whether the 30% investment tax credit (ITC) justifies the premium on domestically manufactured batteries. Two in ten projects are already weighing operation without that benefit, according to Ravi Manghani of the Anza Renewables platform.

The ITC has offered up to a 30% tax credit for battery projects since the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) extended it to storage in 2022, with requirements such as paying prevailing wages. In 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) added foreign entity of concern (FEOC) restrictions, which disqualify projects with too much equipment tied to China. The future of that credit is debated within the broader context of the U.S. energy transition: MIT estimates that power-sector emissions will continue declining toward 2035, while models from Energy Innovation, cited by Canary Media, project less than half the reduction anticipated under prior policy. For developers in Mexico and Latin America evaluating their own domestic-content frameworks, the cost dilemma is the same.

Price is the central variable. Chinese battery units start at $70 to $80 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) and reach around $120 per kWh once tariffs, freight, and services are added; units from other countries, subject to lower tariffs, hover around $130 to $140, though they generally fail to meet FEOC rules; U.S.-manufactured units cost $160 to $180, which can be offset by the ITC. On top of that come compliance costs, such as the union labor required by prevailing-wage rules in California and the legal expenses of transferring the credit. Manghani framed it as a math problem: the premium is not recovered simply by subtracting 30% from total cost.

The calculation remains unresolved. The market is waiting for the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to clarify what counts as Chinese control and how much foreign debt disqualifies a developer. Samsung SDI and LG Energy capacity will not come online before late 2026. For storage developers in the region, the same math weighs on them before closing financing.

This article was drafted with artificial intelligence assistance from verified sources and reviewed by a human editor before publication.

This article was drafted with AI assistance from verified sources and reviewed by a human editor before publication.

Frequently asked questions

¿Por qué los desarrolladores de baterías en EE.UU. reconsideran el crédito fiscal de 30%?
Porque las baterías con contenido doméstico cuestan entre 160 y 180 dólares por kilovatio-hora (kWh), frente a unos 120 de las chinas con aranceles y flete, y se suman costos de cumplimiento. Dos de cada diez proyectos evalúan operar sin el ITC, según datos de Latitude Media del 28 de agosto de 2026.
¿Qué es la restricción FEOC para el ITC de baterías?
FEOC significa foreign entity of concern, entidad extranjera de interés: deja fuera del crédito a los proyectos con demasiado equipo vinculado a China. La regla se sumó al ITC en 2025 con la ley One Big Beautiful Bill. Las guías del fisco estadounidense (IRS) siguen pendientes.
¿Cuánto cuestan las baterías chinas frente a las fabricadas en EE.UU. en 2026?
Las unidades chinas arrancan en 70 a 80 dólares por kilovatio-hora (kWh) y llegan a unos 120 con aranceles, flete y servicios. Las de otros países rondan 130 a 140 dólares; las fabricadas en Estados Unidos, 160 a 180 dólares por kWh, según el análisis de Latitude Media del 28 de agosto de 2026.
Share:
← All news